EXCLUSIVE: The Ugly Truth About America’s War Machine

Colonel Douglas Macgregor offers a bleak, unvarnished assessment of America’s spiraling military entanglements, warning that the U.S. is edging toward a multi-front disaster reminiscent of Britain in 1914. He dismisses Trump’s new plan to route arms to Ukraine via allies as half-measures that achieve nothing strategically, describing it as an exercise in political posturing meant to avoid decisive choices. Far from shifting the balance on the battlefield, Macgregor argues these deliveries merely prolong an unwinnable conflict that threatens to deplete U.S. missile stocks in days, forcing choices no one wants to confront.

He skewers Washington’s delusions about toppling Putin, mocking the fantasy that Russia is a fragile society ready to collapse under sanctions or military pressure. Instead, he explains, Moscow’s position is unambiguous: Ukraine is existential, and Russia will fight to prevent a hostile Western-backed state on its border. He highlights an uncomfortable truth rarely aired in the mainstream—that far from being manipulated by Putin, Trump has been played by domestic hawks like Lindsey Graham, who appeal to his ego with talk of being “played,” all while ignoring the real limits of American power.

But Macgregor’s most damning insights come when he describes the broader strategic folly: the United States has no manufacturing base to sustain a global confrontation, yet insists on confronting Russia in Ukraine, backing Israel’s war with Iran, and threatening China over Taiwan. We are, he says, “really, really, really over our heads”—a phrase that should alarm anyone paying attention.

Macgregor does not mince words about the reality of America’s missile stockpiles: after just eight days of high-intensity fighting, the conventional arsenal would be exhausted, leaving only nuclear escalation on the table. He suggests Trump himself recognizes this, explaining the president’s attempt to look “a little bit pregnant” by giving some weapons but avoiding full commitment. This political cowardice, Macgregor says, changes nothing on the ground while signaling confusion and weakness to allies and adversaries alike.

Far from deterring Moscow, these policies deepen the Kremlin’s conviction that the U.S. cannot be trusted. Macgregor traces this back to 2014, when the U.S. backed the coup in Kyiv, and to the failure of the Minsk accords and arms control treaties unilaterally abandoned by Washington. In his words, Russia has no reason to believe anything the U.S. says. For him, Putin’s consistency contrasts sharply with America’s shifting, duplicitous posture.

On Iran, Macgregor is equally unflinching. He argues the U.S. is already at war in the Middle East, acting as Israel’s co-belligerent while pretending to seek peace. He says Trump’s bombings of Iran have made the region more volatile, not less, and warns that Netanyahu’s long-term objective remains regional fragmentation—turning countries into manageable, divided territories. He frames this as a colonial policy, designed to replace populations with settlers while sowing endless division.

His harshest critique, rarely heard in mainstream media, is that American presidents are captive to lobbies—the Israel lobby, the war lobby, the defense industry. He calls Trump’s advisors manipulators who appeal to his ego and oversimplify crises, while the CIA, MI6, and Mossad run operations independently, out of presidential control. Macgregor suggests Trump is barely aware of the subversive activities his own government supports, lacking both the curiosity and patience to understand them.

He draws a chilling historical parallel to Britain before World War I, describing an empire in industrial decline that chose war over reform. America, he warns, faces the same choice today: confront the hard reality of debt, decaying industry, and ungovernable commitments, or launch wars it cannot sustain. Unlike Britain, he suggests, America may not even have allies willing or able to rescue it from the consequences.

Macgregor sees no evidence that Washington understands the stakes. He says even now, Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran would prefer to do business with the U.S., but patience is wearing thin. He likens Ukraine to Cuba—a strategic red line for Russia—and warns that pushing further risks catastrophic escalation. In his telling, American leaders refuse to grasp that sovereignty is non-negotiable for Russia, and that threatening its existence guarantees war.

Above all, Macgregor’s analysis is a stark warning that America’s bipartisan foreign policy elite is sleepwalking toward World War III, not through grand design but through cowardice, delusion, and the inability to accept a diminished role in the world. He argues the choice is still there—to reform, to retreat, to rebuild at home—but for now, no one in Washington is willing to make it.

Colonel Douglas Macgregor is a retired U.S. Army officer, military strategist, and author renowned for his uncompromising analysis of modern warfare and defense policy. A 1976 graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point, he earned a Ph.D. in international relations from the University of Virginia and served for over two decades in the U.S. Army, culminating in his role as Director of the Joint Operations Center at Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE). Macgregor is best known for his command in the 1991 Gulf War’s Battle of 73 Easting, where his unit achieved a decisive victory against Iraqi forces, an action that shaped his thinking on rapid, maneuver-based operations.

After retiring as a colonel, Macgregor became one of the U.S. military’s most influential—and controversial—reform advocates, calling for deep structural change in force design and strategy. He has authored several widely read books on military transformation and the failures of U.S. interventionism, such as Breaking the Phalanx and Transformation Under Fire. His experience includes extensive work with NATO and advisory roles in the Pentagon, where he developed concepts for joint operational warfare and critiqued the post–Cold War obsession with nation-building. A frequent commentator on U.S. foreign policy, Macgregor is valued for his blunt, iconoclastic style and deep knowledge of military history and strategy—qualities that make him a formidable voice on America’s entanglements in Ukraine, the Middle East, and beyond.

Source: